Conversation

2) so, if all relationships were monogamous and heterosexual, and there were as many women in the world as men, then the effect of “economic pressures” on the ratio of single men to single women…
4
60
3) …would be null, because there would by definition be exactly the same number of each. There would be some number of couples, and that would be exactly the number of men and of women in a relationship.
3
61
4) the gender discrepancy doesn’t have anything to do with economic pressure or gender roles. There are more single men than single women because there are more women than men in relationships…
2
64
5) …which can only really be caused by one thing: somehow there are individual relationships with more women than men, more frequently than the reverse. In other words, more women are LGBT than men.
Image
6
68
Replying to
5) So the study is interesting after all! Either men are cheating more than women, or sometimes a woman thinks they’re in a relationship but the man thinks it’s just something casual. Honestly, probably both :p The study just doesn’t have anything to do with TIME’s headline.
48
240
Show replies
Replying to
The answer is (a) and always has been! You have more female ancestors than male A bigger % of women leave offspring compared to men More daughters are born in hard times because chances are high they'll pass on genes compared to sons. The opposite is true in times of wealth
Image
Image
Image
1
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show