1) Ok come on TIME, this article is pretty pathetic.
How did no editors catch that it was logically impossible?
time.com/6104105/more-s
Conversation
3) …would be null, because there would by definition be exactly the same number of each. There would be some number of couples, and that would be exactly the number of men and of women in a relationship.
Replying to
You are wrong, your assumptions only hold in a fixed point in time. You assume that time does not exist.
Over a lifetime a man can have like a very high number of female partner while those only had a few men.
And that's actually the experience of a lot of people.
1
2

