1) OK so pet peeve:
You're playing against a great offence, so you decide to run the ball more to "keep the ball out of their QB's hands".
Conversation
2) This is a really common suggestion. 538, known "quants", just suggested it without any pushback! fivethirtyeight.com/features/rejoi
But it makes no sense.
1
1
43
3) The thing is, if you run the ball, taking up more clock...
Then that's time *neither* side can take advantage of.
Let's say you can choose between 75% running or 75% passing on this possession, and each have equal % of scoring.
Replying to
4)
75% run: ~10m left
75% pass: ~12m left
But just adding 2m to the game clock doesn't particularly advantage one team or the other, it just increases both team's point totals.
Teams alternate possessions. You'll both get roughly the same number no matter how slowly you play!
6
2
43
Replying to
the fundamental premise of running the clock is that your team has the advantage and is taking lower risk because there is a definitively lower % risk when running vs passing
Replying to
But Sam you are forgetting that running the ball is also a psychological play to lure the deep backs in close and open up for the bomb pass
Kinda like bull posting and then opening a big short
Replying to
Generally running teams are focusing their salary cap on defense
Get a lead, hold on to the ball, win the field position battle, repeat
More teams win super bowls with this formula than high octane offenses




