Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

@hoakbuilds

We will be removing it completely.

312

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Replying to

@phantom

I'm worried about this -- there are probably in-between things here that are safe but preserve a lot of the value

4:51 PM · Aug 31, 2021Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

what if you just have a whitelisted set of sites for it?

Replying to

and

and you'd have to opt-in to that?

Show replies

Replying to

and

Quote Tweet

Replying to @SBF_FTX

Sam, would you be interested in your lookalike penguin? I've got him and have been trying to get him into your hands

Replying to

and

after the hacks today and on Monday needs to go was devestated all night and yesterday and today was a bit better considering I lost my nfts and sol - shame we can’t get them back now that guy has taken more than 30 nfts

Replying to

and

Agreed, should be optional as it helps provide an additional safety measure for users.

@cjensen@masthead.social

Replying to

and

How about being able to set a transfer limit for auto-approve maybe? Only transactions below X SOL can be auto-approved where X defaults to 10 or something small, but can be changed by the user.

Replying to

and

Seems pointless when the issue is that you can't see if you are signing to send 5 Sol or your entire wallet to the contract.

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Show replies

Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

Show