1) Even more updates on the crypto amendments in the Senate infrastructure bill!
Context:
Conversation
3) Which is odd. What if something has multiple steps to its consensus mechanism, one of which is PoS?
I guess they're worried about things which are only dubiously validating?
Either way, it brings it closer to being a bit of a mess, and choosing favorites.
Replying to
4) There also doesn't exist an exception for developers, who again don't know anything about the state of taxes of users of a decentralized blockchain.
So it's a mess. But it's also progress, and evidence that in the drive towards compromise, something good is happening:
2
9
161
5) The people involved, as a collective, seem to be responding to reasonable forces, if not quickly enough.
Of course, there's always time for more twists!
Quote Tweet
Bc @SenatorHagerty has objected, the Senate is debating for the full 30 hrs. This will end around 7pm Sun. After that votes begin on the full bill text, but it is still not clear if there will be a vote on the amendments. It's possible none of the #crypto amds will get a vote. twitter.com/SenatorHagerty…
9
5
169
Replying to
Exactly this
Quote Tweet
This may be useful today re: the US vote. It's a paper detailing novel consensus using variants of POW & POS. Not final draft yet but I've worked feverishly on relevant sections to highlight the issue of excluding only POW in the bill. Would it capture this or not? Very grey!
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show