Conversation

To be clear here: twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/sta 1) There are lots of advantages to PoW. Its security is less reliant on historical ordering than PoS, it's in some cases harder to quickly buy scale to attack, harder to hedge attacks, etc.
Quote Tweet
"It's the responsible thing to do to mitigate to the extent you can," says @SBF_Alameda on @FTX_Official climate pledge. "There are only two major cryptocurrencies that have large energy usage. It's #bitcoin and #ethereum...proof of work is where all the energy usage comes from."
Embedded video
1:42
188.5K views
62
323
2) BTC (soon) being the only top 5 coin with PoW sets it apart, some senses in a good way, for the above reasons 3) The energy use is the security method of PoW, so you can't remove that and keep PoW. 4) That being said, it *does* use a lot of energy, and that does have a cost
26
109
5) I'm not trying to make claims about whether that cost is worth it -- just that it's a fact that most of the impact comes from it 6) You could use e.g. L2s, lightning, etc. to make tx's cheaper, both in money and in energy 7) Either way, it's relevant for calculating impact
39
107
Replying to and
So, L2 already exists for fast transactions .. odd you didn’t mention that on the interview and rather wanted to focus on tokens with less secure base layers. I guess this is just another example of people not being able to escape their incentives.
8
68
Replying to and
takes a bit of getting use to live-fire, goes so fast, those were soft-ball questions too. next level if the questions are hostile and biased cut-offs. just have to say what you want to say then continue saying it "going back to previous topic". the questions are a suggestion :)
2
36
Show replies
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show