Conversation

To be clear here: twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/sta 1) There are lots of advantages to PoW. Its security is less reliant on historical ordering than PoS, it's in some cases harder to quickly buy scale to attack, harder to hedge attacks, etc.
Quote Tweet
"It's the responsible thing to do to mitigate to the extent you can," says @SBF_Alameda on @FTX_Official climate pledge. "There are only two major cryptocurrencies that have large energy usage. It's #bitcoin and #ethereum...proof of work is where all the energy usage comes from."
Embedded video
1:42
188.5K views
62
323
2) BTC (soon) being the only top 5 coin with PoW sets it apart, some senses in a good way, for the above reasons 3) The energy use is the security method of PoW, so you can't remove that and keep PoW. 4) That being said, it *does* use a lot of energy, and that does have a cost
26
109
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
New sources of renewable energy and more efficient ASIC miners will ultimately defeat the Bitcoin energy FUD. Why? Because they will allow mining to become more profitable with less energy waste.
Replying to and
#5 is the problem. You SHOULD BE EVALUATING the claims that it is worth it (it most definitely is) before you run your mouth off about how much energy it uses. Not doing so is disingenuous at the very least.
1
5
Replying to and
Point (6) here goes a long way because it’s not just Lightning, but entire blockchains like Stacks recycle Bitcoin’s PoW to enable transaction scaling. Smart contracts secured by Bitcoin that run on recycled PoW.
1
50