Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
3) First of all, I think the process has been really messy. I think doing a raise is a good idea. But given the hassle likely involved from negative feedback, I might not follow through; I'm not sure this fight is worth fighting.
1
49
SBF
@SBF_FTX
4) Why might it be good? Because some VCs are really connected and influential and knowledgeable and smart. Some VCs will fucking fight for you. The second are the ones you want; if they're also in the first group, even better.
1
59
SBF
@SBF_FTX
5) Why might it be bad? It's a hassle, and some VCs are useless, and it costs discounts.
1
39
SBF
@SBF_FTX
6) So how would _I_ have designed this? First, given the PR issues, I think that selling at market price + adding on 1:1 options with a $12 strike price and 5 year expiry is the right move. Without PR issues, maybe just a 25% discount.
6
79
SBF
@SBF_FTX
7) Who would I give allocation to? This is hard, but: First, I would talk to each prospective one, and filter out ones I wasn't excited by. Then, I'd reach out to 10 founders I trusted, and give them an anonymous poll on the VCs.
1
50
SBF
@SBF_FTX
8) How much size? I'd say something like: --$10m each for the top 5 from the survey --$1m each for 6-15 --another $10m total for the community, first come first serve
1
60
SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
10) Some light feedback for some VCs -- One of the most important criteria for a founder is: which VCs are most excited about what we're doing? Think about your pitches in that light.
6
86
SBF
@SBF_FTX
11) And finally, some light feedback for the community-- Remember that everyone is different, and that's true of VCs as well. Keep that in mind, and consider whether positive or negative generalizations are justified.
9
73