Conversation

6) As I understand it, Bullish is basically: a) build a centralized crypto exchange b) Require KYC c) write trades etc. to EOS blockchain c) have an AMM that provides on the exchange with the $6b of crypto Bullish owns d) let users provide in the AMM too (it's not live yet)
6
142
7) So basically, Bullish going to is a standard exchange, except that it'll use it's $6b of capital to provide a bunch of liquidity. Is that worth $3B? You can be the judge of that.
5
141
8) What about that liquidity providing? Well let's dive into an example. They have ~$5B of BTC on hand, and ~$1B of cash. Let's say they raise more and end up putting $1B each of USD and BTC in a BTC/USD pool, using x*y=k. Then, the pool has ~$5m offered within 1%.
3
87
10) They're assuming 75% annualized BTC volatility, which isn't crazy. If BTC goes up 75% this year, ignoring fees/spreads: Without providing: $1B USD, $1.75B BTC = $2.75B With providing/IL: $1.32 USD, $1.32B BTC = $2.64B So it's paying ~$100m/year to get 20% of FTX's depth
4
103
11) Which means paying $500m/year in impermanent loss to get top tier liquidity for BTC/USD. Maybe $1B/year for all their books combined. That's..... a lot to pay.
11
167
13) Well, basically, they're: (a) ignoring IL (b) assuming that customers are paying 16bps to trade (c) assuming $1b/day of volume (d) assuming they have $2.5B of USD to provide with (for BTC/USD--and more for others) Wouldn't we all love to have those!
Image
4
128
14) Also, just for fun, here's a chart of competitors' 2023 EV/EBITDA. I love these charts! Though somehow they bury the lede: if I knew every company's 2023 EBITDA, I would go bet on stock and crypto prices, not think of relative exchange valuations.
Image
4
105
Replying to
16) Create a company, put $6B of crypto in it, SPAC it at $9B, and now people have a way to buy crypto with their brokerage accounts at a 50% premium. Maybe they will!
7
275