Conversation

Proof-of-work is absolute truth, proof-of-stake is relative truth. Both have their role. But for the most important transactions it's better to produce more clean energy than to give up on the undeletable history that accumulated work provides.

350

2,202

Balaji

@balajis

Jun 20, 2021

It's hard to express this compactly to a non-technical person, but basically: it's harder to fake the results of a massive calculation done over ten years with datacenters full of hardware than it is to convince a fixed set of humans to change their minds and rewrite history.

570

Replying to

I think I'm missing something here, would love some more color! As I understand, PoW could re-write history the same as PoS if you got the right "fixed set of humans". For PoW it's 51% of miners, for PoS it's 51% of stakers. Maybe one is more robust than the other -- why?

Replying to

and

I guess what I'm wondering is, are you arguing: (a) there's something very fundamentally different about blockchain security via miners vs via stakers (b) in practice, one is much safer (why?) than the other, although in theory they have similar strengths/weaknesses

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Jun 20, 2021

so I'm confused -- AFAIK PoW concentrates it in the miners, which are a select few wealthy people: blockchain.com/pools

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

SBF

@SBF_FTX

how is this different from PoS? The ecosystem could also ignore the will of stakers in PoS unless the stakers go along with a fork they want...

7:23 AM · Jun 20, 2021Twitter Web App

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Jun 20, 2021

eh if the latter then I don't think Balaji's initial thread holds