Proof-of-work is absolute truth, proof-of-stake is relative truth. Both have their role. But for the most important transactions it's better to produce more clean energy than to give up on the undeletable history that accumulated work provides.
Conversation
Replying to
I think I'm missing something here, would love some more color!
As I understand, PoW could re-write history the same as PoS if you got the right "fixed set of humans".
For PoW it's 51% of miners, for PoS it's 51% of stakers.
Maybe one is more robust than the other -- why?
3
24
I guess what I'm wondering is, are you arguing:
(a) there's something very fundamentally different about blockchain security via miners vs via stakers
(b) in practice, one is much safer (why?) than the other, although in theory they have similar strengths/weaknesses
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
so I'm confused -- AFAIK PoW concentrates it in the miners, which are a select few wealthy people: blockchain.com/pools
1
3
Show replies
I'm arguing (a).
Because mining is a computation, while staking is more like a BoD vote, even if the current set of miners collude they can't rewrite the entire chain history. That requires years of compute.
See Poelstra on "costless simulation" here.
download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/pos.pdf
2
7
40
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
Hugos article about this subject is great :
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show



