Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
1) So on energy usage of BTC: The profile will change long-term. Right now the main driver is from block rewards. But as block rewards exponentially decay, those will become less relevant. Long-term, there are really two core drivers.
46
1,327
SBF
@SBF_FTX
2) First, transaction fees. There's limited block space, and transactions will basically be bidding in auctions for those. That means that greater demand for BTC transfers --> higher tx fees --> breakeven point with more miners --> more energy used.
1
210
SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
4) The payoff from attacking the network scales roughly linearly in BTC price (market cap and/or $ value of xfers per block). So I think this scaling is similar to the tx fee scaling.
1
172
SBF
@SBF_FTX
5) Which means that: a) most of the current energy usage will decay away as block rewards go down b) the rest of the energy usage will scale ~linearly with BTC price
2
215
SBF
@SBF_FTX
6) All of this being said: a) right now crypto doesn't use a large % of global energy b) you have to look at the other side--how much do we waste powering middlemen in inefficient systems as is? c) even if BTC is value it might not be how most tx's happen
6
443
SBF
@SBF_FTX
7) But I think there _is_ long-term pressure to find a chain with great long-term scaling, that can power billions of users' transfers at minimal cost and latency. Anyone know a chain that fits that description?
65
404
Illia (root.near) (🇺🇦, ⋈)
@ilblackdragon
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
and
@SBF_Alameda
Agree with total demand on transfers on L1. Security on its own doesnt make sense. It will be correlating with rewards from mining blocks. If all the transactions move to BTC L2 (CEX, lightning, etc), and block rewards decay - why would miners exert so much energy to secure it?
3