anyone else feeling a bit sympathetic for Reef after this post?
medium.com/reef-finance/o
(i'm a longterm Alameda/FTX fanboy, just calling it like I see it)
Conversation
Was there a “binding contract” or just this discussion?
3
Show replies
agreed. REEF complete noobs total unprofessional. Legally SBF team didn't do anything wrong. That threatening part could be ethically wrong but that came after REEF backtracked on their deal. In short REEF is shit
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
1
So basically, Alameda bought 20% discount OTC to dump on community! 👏 , i guess that’s a bad move. Apologize and move on!
1
6
If they didn't want their token to be sold, they should not have sold them in the 1st place.
You can't have your cake and eat it.
1
Show replies
Reef screwed up hard here. But making threats of delistings is also terrible.
2
If you’re serious about Serum, you need to create a strict separation between Serum, FTX, and Alameda. No one will want to build on Solana because they’ll think it’s a centralized chain controlled by SBF/FTX/Alameda.
1
12








