9) But even if you've secured everything vital, you can't predict everything disruptive.
For instance, the most recent time that FTX had ~1 minute of GUI slowness, this was the cause:
Conversation
11) recently started an interesting thread. The question: can Solana actually, really, support an on-chain, decentralized ?
twitter.com/BrendanEich/st
There were lots of interesting back and forths on it.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @mjpldn @m_j_po and 2 others
500M tweets/day (and growing) is 5787 tweets/sec. What is likely TPS for final tweet-txns (typos4evar ;-) of Solana given the contention from worst-case and average user load? Not 50KTPS. twitter.com/BrendanEich/st…
2
6
24
13) And, really, most of the future of Serum, and of Solana, can't be answered analytically.
It depends on what we do.
1
22
16) (As an aside: I'm incredibly proud of what our team has done the last two years, and how far we've gotten.
We're not the only ones growing, though.
And while we obviously take different approaches, , and @OKEx have fought hard for their success.)
1
19
17) Some projects are "blue chip" because they're old, and that's frankly worth a lot.
Even if they never do anything innovative again, they have a large userbase and adoption.
A few of these come to mind: coingecko.com/en/defi
2
13
18) The real danger zone -- the place you can't escape from, really -- is if you're new, and *also* don't build.
Maybe that's what the world got wrong about : it's new, and had tough times.
But it never stopped building.
1
3
37
19) And so when I look at a new project, I ask:
--Does the world need this?
--Will it be well done?
and above all:
--Will it keep pushing forward with all it has?
Because in the end no one guesses exactly the right thing to build the first time.
