Dan Robinson@danrobinson·Dec 4, 2020Gloating about consensus failures is usually not a great look815134
SBF@SBF_FTX·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @danrobinsonI feel like I deserve much worse than this from you after the last few days!115
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @SBF_FTX and @SBF_AlamedaWhy would I be resentful—you didn’t land a single blow 🙂4134
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @danrobinson and @SBF_AlamedaYour actually-effective effective altruism is also orders of magnitude more impactful than you being wrong about Solana or AMMs28
SBF@SBF_FTX·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @danrobinsontechnically I take this as a grave insult! -(a lot) * (orders of magnitude) = (a really large negative impact)11
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @SBF_FTX and @SBF_AlamedaThe word magnitude implies that I’m referring to the vector’s length, not its direction!13
SBF@SBF_FTX·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @danrobinsonI think you're misunderstanding where the negative sign is coming from ;)1
SBF@SBF_FTX·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @danrobinson(I think I'm right about AMMs and Solana, which I think would mean "me being wrong about AMMs and Solana" has a negative sign)43
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·Dec 4, 2020Replying to @SBF_FTX and @SBF_AlamedaHaha, well, sure. So ironclad logic dictates that either you are wrong about Solana and AMMs, or that your charitable work has negative impact. Good luck with that dilemma26