Having impact on coins has nothing to do with the pots having heterogenous investment opportunities, right?
You could still have each subpot just make the exact same bets the macro portfolio would make, but scaled down.
Conversation
If bets have an effect on the market, then sure, the subportfolio manager would find it useful to know how large the total portfolio is (to know how much capital is following the same strategy).
But it will still be maximizing its own log wealth IN THAT CONTEXT.
2
1
ok fine how about your future earning potential?
that's not something you can turn into ETH easily but it is something which should be inside the log
1
or locked coins you have, or your house, or any number of other things that aren't ETH
1
Uh sure but have we resolved the math thing? Was I right about the math?
1
1
uh you were right that it depends on the assumptions you make, sorry about that!
in order for your actualy claim to be right you need to make batshit crazy assumptions
Quote Tweet
2
er sorry about this, that was way too mean
there was no reason for me to phrase it that way
(I get kind of triggered by people misunderstanding Kelly)
3
4
*interested in hearing more about the last sentence 👀
1
2
Heh
This is a classic trap for people who know a decent amount of math, get swayed by a sexy-sounding sentence, and fail to go back and critical examine it.
I think it was maybe the most accurate predictor of whether someone at Jane Street was/would become a good trader.
2
2
12
Regardless of whether Kelly is ultimately good or bad, which of us do you think has misunderstood Kelly more in this discussion?
1
oh boy what do you think I'm going to say here? :P