Conversation

agreed that negative lottery tickets are different here but every approach gets that one right! but in e.g. st petersberg, hold USDC vs hold ERC20 token vs LP, classic Kelly question, etc., the max EV = max upside strategy = bet it all every time on the max EV option
1
2
But more generally my point is that "maximize odds of winning" is not what really matters, and neither is "maximize the max upside"; both are "good" things to have but neither are perfect, and really this is just an argument between max(EV) and max(EV(log))
1
4
No! I am not trying to maximize EV of anything! I want to pick the strategy that beats yours 99.99% of the time. That’s my terminal goal Kelly takes that input and spits out that I should maximize EV(log(wealth)), but that preference is the consequence, not the cause
1
6
Earnestly, if you dm me your address before the pod I will ship you a copy of Fortune’s Formula as well as annotated research notes and arXiv keywords. The general optimality of the Kelly criterion (beyond the narrow context in which it’s usually explained) is a deep topic.
2
4
Some day we'll have deeper in-person conversations and learn more about each other. I guess for now my only response is that I think you are massively underestimating me in this context. I understand you disagree with that though!
1
3