6) None of this proves anything!
But it is at least a datapoint in favor of "prediction markets were about right going in, 538 was way too low on Trump".
That's not the only possibly narrative.
But it seems like the obvious one.
Conversation
7) All of which would have been ok, except that didn't say "yeah prediction markets are cool too, idk, ours is just a model, it's unclear what's right".
He said this:
Quote Tweet
3
2
16
8) And, now, when presented with a bit of a miss, his response is...
Quote Tweet
LOL to all of you who gave 538's model shit for producing really weird maps every now and then.
Show this thread
2
4
It was not terrible though. Nuance needs to be recognized. He shared that. And he in fact ends up being for the most part right in final conclusion.
1
Replying to
not sure about "ends up being for the most part right", I think he was more off than most people were.
And I totally recognized nuance--half my post was saying that it wasn't egregious except that he kept doubling down.
1
2
I hear you on the double down. Felt sort of like he was under siege early when everyone was cashing checks that weren’t signed. So that was his battle back mode to everyone hitting him hard early.
1
2
Replying to
yeah agreed, except... those people seem like maybe they were always kinda right
2
1
I think this is a pretty charitable interpretation. Last night a lot of his responses were to people dunking on him not because they thought the prediction markets had better odds reflected than their model, but that they were accurately predicting a Trump victory.
1
2
TBF people like you and others were actually making this nuanced point, but the vast majority of people were calling it for Trump and trying to dunk on them for that, so I kind of get him taking his victory laps today despite them being off wildly on odds.
2
2