AMM good π AMM bad π«
AMM good π AMM bad π«
AMM good π AMM bad π«
Help I canβt decide
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE
Conversation
Replying to
Heh
FWIW I think faster AMMs are less bad (less uncertainty in fills --> less slippage --> trades are closer to fair --> less IL), and AMMs are in fact a thing some people want!
But yeah mostly I think that bonfida.com/dex is way more powerful than the AMMs.
I agree lower latency makes AMM much better. So does lower network fees!
I think maintaining very high degrees of decentralization/security is also super important which is what makes the first part difficult (albeit not impossible)
4
3
52
Replying to
Yup, agreed. I guess I think that the decentralization/security tradeoffs from it aren't huge -- they're not nothing but realistically anyone running a node on any major blockchain could run one on a fast chain e.g. Solana.
But it does mean that e.g. cellphones can't.
2
1
9
Show replies
The desire for passive investment vehicles will make AMM absorb a velvety big chuck of crypto assets.
"Some" people?
AMMs are for the majority.
And "input + output = swap" will become mainstream.




