5) They are discussing.
They say they'll release a new proposal for COVER tokenomics soon which takes this into account.
Until then, I'm reserving judgement.
Conversation
Curiously, what about Cover Protocol makes you bearish (aside from token distribution)?
1
1
Replying to
eh mostly that I think the use case for it is a bit too niche and only really makes sense if things grow out quite a bit on defi as it is right nwo
2
3
goddamn dude your replies are blazing fast - kudos!
isn't the use case essentially smart contract insurance, $11B of locked funds seems like a reasonably sized market for insurance - no?
Or are you referring to their specific approach?
1
1
Replying to
1) I think insurance market is small % of overall market
2) I don't think current state is sutainable
3) to a decent extent you can get this by doing centralized staking with someone who they back-ends into this but insures it
4) on-chain insurance is really capital intensive
1
1
Agree on (2) + (3)
(4) I'm optimistic that tokenized (composable) positions could make more capital efficient
(1) There's a lot of reused LP Shares baked into TVL - which signals systemic risk is high, thus the insurance premiums should follow.
1
1

