presents aren't quite the same.
Say there are two things--A and B--and over time A/B --> 1 (i.e. they converge).
In his case, treasuries and their futures.
4) In the CEX case, Cyrus has these markets:
-- A / USD
--B / USD
In the AMM case, Cyrus as this pool:
--A / B
The reason he gets the "better" result in the AMM case is because it listed the right market.
5) But in the CEX case--
--they could have just listed a market of A / B, and then his firm could have put out lots of limit orders to provide--buying A/B @ 0.999, and selling A/B @ 1.001
6)
And in the AMM case, if they instead had A/USD and B/USD pools, then when things moved the LPs would get picked off in both at the same time.
They key here is having a single market that expresses the mean reversion rather than a two legged trade that is latency dependent.
Thoughts on the trendiness of AMMs resulting in a short term catalyst for a crypto credit crunch in the markets? TLDR - Permanent loss will result in outflows that reduce debts and credits in the market.
1) Post DeFi mania... Yields are dropping. Some are now turning negative as the market dries up. In a sideways or bearish market, liquidity dries up. Pools will get hurt as arb arises from minor pumps..