I would assume some hilariously tiny amount! The point isn’t the margin per trade, it’s the return on invested capital
Conversation
> it’s the return on invested capital
Got some bad news for you about AMMs... :D
1
That’s exactly the point Hayden is making!
Professional market makers make much higher returns on their capital than liquidity providers make on Uniswap.
Their margin is our opportunity
1
3
I don't think this is the right framing.
Are you implying that AMM LPs are willing to accept a % fee that is so low that sophisticated MMs (and other competing AMMs) just won't bother participating in the market?
Quote Tweet
Replying to @srndptme and @cyounessi1
The following image demonstrates how sophisticated MMs can eat into AMM fees until it is no longer viable to overcome impermanent loss.
2
1
6
No—my point is that AMMs can deploy way more capital because LPs are OK with modest returns and are guaranteed their fair share of fills.
Retail investors, too, are better off trading against an AMM, because liquidity doesn’t tactically dry up.
4
6
I agree that professional market makers undercutting the spread do ruin this nice equilibrium!
The solution to this, as for so many other problems, is to have all trading in the world go through Uniswap
2
9
you should see what happens when a country implements 30bp fees.
(basically retail ends up gambling on options and everyone else trades futures since spot is too expensive.)
2
1
The market doesn’t believe 30 bps is too expensive. If true the useage wouldn’t be there.
1
it wasn't there! until people started paying $3m per day for people to use it.
3
1
Uniswap was doing $100-200m in volume before Sushiswap was announced
1
6
sushiwap is not the only yield in defi