Conversation

Looks like Alameda has some $FIL to sell.

Quote Tweet

Oct 15, 2020

1) a) FTX listing $FIL futures soon, when mainnet launches! b) Filecoin is one of the hottest listings I've ever seen--tons of attention c) That *doesn't* mean it will be good/bad to buy/sell -- it all depends on the price, and the future of the project.

Show this thread

Replying to

Alas, we didn't invest in FIL.

Replying to

also, like, did you notice the 2 whole tweets after that saying that I wasn't saying it would be good to buy/sell and could be either depending on price/etc.?

Replying to

and

I did, but we all know how disclaimers work right? "It would be cool for you to do this, buuuut you really shouldn't... or, you should at least think about it before doing it.... but still, it'd be pretty cool if you did."

Replying to

I think that's not being super fair here: 1) I never said it would be cool to buy it 2) I didn't say "think before buying" I said "think before deciding whether long or short is better" -- I was explicitely neutral between those the whole time, not between buy and fair

Replying to

like, come on, let's go through these sentences one by one. a) fact, listing b) tons of attention, plausibly positive but could mean overheated c) countering (b) and neutral

Replying to

d) neutral, countering (b) e) neutral, countering (b) f) neutral, countering (b) g) neutral, countering (b) h) neutral, countering (b) i) neutral, countering (b) j) neutral, countering (b) k) neutral, countering (b) l) neutral, countering (b)

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Replying to

@SBF_FTX

If saying that it's not investment advice and idk if it'll go up or down 10 times in a thread -- making up 80% of the entire thread (!!!) -- isn't enough, then there is no plausible path for having a crypto community of any sort

12:25 PM · Oct 15, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

like, seriously, I don't take this lightly, and am furious at you for posting what you did. What you posted will cause people to YOLO in and then try to blame me for it. That's not OK. That's way worse that what you falsely accused me of. I know that it was partially in jest.

Replying to

and

I can see how it can be sensitive since you are a public figure (whether you like it or not). But that's the baggage that comes with being a public figure in this space. Everything is up for interpretation and you know what, at least you're clarifying. Good on you.

Show replies