Conversation

Replying to

and

3) if it has a year of stability, is on binance/huobi/ftx/etc., and *circulating* cap of $300m, sure, I would if it were a scam!

Replying to

and

Is it really difficult to keep it 'stable' when the MMs stabilizing the price are run by you, you have deep pockets, and a vested interest in keeping that price stable, and also happen to control basically the entire float?

Replying to

and

This is the entire issue I have with FTT being accepted as collateral. I dgaf if you short YFI or UNI or LINK if you use real money to do so. I do have an issue that you convinced your buddy Jeff to list your monopoly money so you can take out massive loans.

Replying to

and

EXACTLY. If you actually have the courage of your convictions then cover your FTT backed shorts and back them w ETH. After all, your initial defense was hedging a down market. Collateralizing shorts w your own funny money takes zero courage (balls).

Replying to

and

I think you probably haven't thought through that statement very well. What would be the implications of FTT going down a lot? It'd be really bad for us.

Replying to

and

U whale and to be clear I respect that. In the interest of respect let’s agree not to lie or bs each other. Tell me in one tweet how FTT matters to my CREAM, MTA, CRV, or any other bag. Y is ur ability to short everything using collateral you created from thin air good for me?

Replying to

and

if you're not using CREAM then it doesn't matter for you if you *are* using CREAM then it's presumably to get interest for lending things out (which only happens if we or someone else borrows), or to borrow assets (this lets you borrow FTT)

Replying to

and

It’s late and I’m old, but I ask again how is your ability to short $75M using collateral you solely control (CREATED) “good for me” or anyone that isn’t invested w you? Let’s agree you’re good @ what u do, tell me how u shorting my bag w ur magic FTT money somehow helps me.

Replying to

and

shorting on CREAM requires paying interest to the lenders, so they make money from it, which presumably makes them happy or else they wouldn't be lending on CREAM

Replying to

and

Or if they're lending to borrow, then its' symmetric--each person's loan is the price they pay for getting to borrow, and wouldn't work if no one could borrow it

Replying to

and

and it gives people the opportunity to borrow and use the FTT loaned out on CREAM

6:47 AM · Oct 12, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

Your stance is “they’re lending” and it is 100% valid, be honest tho, no one expects to lend to a whale that crates his own liquidity. Ur explanation is nice, but circular, you’ve yet to defend shorting normie bags. Tell me how your shorts “help” me or anyone. (read normies)