1) bathwater
Conversation
3) in case you were living under a rock, or for some reason prioritize the rest of your life above crypto twitter drama (priorities people!)--
yesterday this was proposed for CREAM governance: snapshot.page/#/cream/propos
2
2
19
4) Let me start with a few high level remarks:
first, that I understand where this is coming from, and some version of it isn't crazy!
There's a lot of FTT on right now.
I think that some version of a cap on single assets put there would be reasonable.
1
1
11
5) Second, I understand governance here and if the CREAM community wants a change, ok.
But I'm skeptical of the current system:
As of now a single address is >75% of all votes: etherscan.io/address/0xDa49
which is fine! but a bit ironic.
Also how does a 3 choice vote resolve?
2
17
Catching up on the drama, but did you borrow YFI and then dump the price on exchanges to make the short profitable? Did you not see anything wrong with that? Would that be market manipulation in a normal market? Genuinely asking, not sure.
1
Replying to
No, that's not at all the point!
Alameda did sell some YFI, to hedge. Not all selling is evil.
Show more replies

