Conversation

Replying to and
like not saying your point is crazy here--it's not! just that you're overplaying your hand a little bit, like playing as if your point is 2x stronger than it is
2
1
Replying to and
I really don't think I am, 25% of the entire $FTT is on Cream, that's 39x the daily volume and 40% of all collateral on Crean No matter how you paint this, it's incredibly risky for users, depositors are already having issues withdrawing their funds due to a lack of liquidity
4
15
Replying to
guess we're going to have to agree to disagree then, not saying you're totally wrong here just that there's nuances to it, but if you're not willing to give any ground here then :shrug:
2
3
so: 1) uniswap was a bad datapoint 2) otc market is really deep for FTT 3) I personally am happy to buy a bunch 4) coins with buy/burns etc. tend to have away deeper liquidity 5) there's a flip side to this: the more you cut down on lending, the less usage the protocol gets
3
6
so I think a big thing to think about here is -- if FTT drops 50%, what happened to the rest of crypto? If everything drops 50% then it's fine b/c both lending and borrowing sides dropped the same. Historically FTT has a low-ish beta, so an overall market move wouldn't do it.
10
42
like you could see all DeFi projects blow out 5x in either direction, and every yield/amm/borrow-lending/etc. platform get stressed in the same direction at once, getting like $5b of one-sided flow in volatile correlated assets. CeFi doesn't solve this. DeFi doesn't solve this.
1
2