Conversation
3) Let me start by saying something more popular:
has caught up to CMC. It happened slowly and then all at once.
That's extremely impressive.
And it's extremely bad news for CMC.
3
87
4) And it happened, in part, because Binance further hurt CMC's reputation by the perception of bias.
A perception of bias did the damage. But there was also actual bias.
@OKEx is currently ranked #37: coinmarketcap.com/rankings/excha
Tell me that's reasonable, I dare you.
3
1
38
5) is the better product.
But that's been true for a while.
And if you look at what's happened _recently_ --
Gecko has gotten better.
But CMC is a world of difference.
2
4
61
8) And, I mean, I don't *know* why.
But I have a guess.
Pretty much the day Binance bought CMC, it started getting better -- a lot better.
It has a lot of catching up to do, but the product has gone from hopelessly fucked to competitive.
Replying to
9) And in the end the perception of bias, combined with the historical sins and the actual bias, might do it in.
Plus, CoinGecko keeps getting better: they're hungry.
But for CMC, there's hope; their BTC pricing is no longer 1% off, and their exchange lists are useful.
15
1
56
Sam who has the most accurate reference data in your opinion? Which one would you 'trust' most and why?
- CRYPTOCOMPARE0%
- COINGECKO
93.3% - COINMARKETCAP6.7%
15 votesFinal results
1
Don't use CMC but if it was hopelessly fcked, why pay 400 for it?
