Conversation

All of this isn’t to diminish your accomplishment. Amazing work, cool UI and great go to market. Perfect is impossible. Order books are long term bad design as the space gets more advanced. AMMs were a great first step and we need more innovation.
1
Long term I think we'll need some new kind of encryption to re-enable order books. There's been some interesting work with time-enabled encryption (decryptable after a certain amount of time). Gnosis has some interesting stuff around multi-asset auctions, reducing frontrunning.
2
Imagine going to a trader on wallstreet and asking them to trade on your platform but tell them that everytime they place an order someone else can adjust the entire market in real time before applying the order. That's the current state of DEX orderbook.
2
On an orderbook it's "infinite" though. Time stops and lets you make buyers buy from you and sellers sell to you in any pattern you want at the middle line. If Nasdaq offered you that access you'd pay a trillion dollars.
1
Is your claim that the miners, if there happen to be both buys and sells in the same block *and* the orderbook isn't tick-wide, could provide to both, thus tightening up the book and giving the customer better execution?
1
1
I'm not "claiming" anything - I know you're familiar with "Flash Boys" (1 and 2). DEX order book is as if the high speed fiber optic line could *also* pause trading and let the person insert any buy or sell order they want *and* remove any competition.
1
1
Show replies