Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
17) There was this weird agreement: that vaporware doubled DeFi. And that the vaporware was going to crash, and that maybe it was *morally bad*. But that the sector's gains from it were real and permanent and *morally good* and a sign of the strength of the community.
2
17
SBF
@SBF_FTX
18) "Smart money" was decrying the yield farming bubble and running from it. The same people were going head over heels into the blue-chip rally it had created. There were no bears until things crashed.
1
20
SBF
@SBF_FTX
19) It was reminiscent of... ...well, everyone knows where this sentence is going. I remember a high school classmate's post on Facebook: "sure bitconnect might be a scam, but c'mon, look at that graph. I'm up 5000%; you missed it."
1
24
SBF
@SBF_FTX
20) And smart money was like "lol have fun when the scam crashes, we're going to go buy BTC and ETH and EOS and XRP and NEO and FIL". Which, then, also crashed.
2
25
SBF
@SBF_FTX
22) So, ok, back to DeFi. Did the blue-chips "deserve" their gains? Were their losses "unfair"? What's their future?
2
15
SBF
@SBF_FTX
23) I don't know, that's for the world to decide, not me. But I guess what I'd ask is: In a post-hype world (are we there yet?), how are the products?
1
22
SBF
@SBF_FTX
24) When they're forced to stand on their own, with no bubble lifting them up: will they float? Some will, probably. Some won't. That is the way.
2
36
SBF
@SBF_FTX
25) And it's sad, and unfortunate, that not everything's great. Sometimes things are underrated, sometimes they're overhyped. But it is what it is, and I don't think it's morally bad to say so, or morally good to pretend otherwise.
19
61
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more