Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
8) Maxi: you're counting decentralized computers like ETH; BTC is 95% of hard money. It's already won. Non: wait why doesn't ETH count? Just because it's better? Maxi: yes, exactly! Non: ok this conversation is stupid.
6
7
SBF
@SBF_FTX
9) Maxi: no, don't you see: Etherum _does_ have more use cases, which is great! That's good for it, and I'm happy. But imagine if ETH had better tech _and_ was better money. It would be waaay bigger than BTC. Like twice as big! But it's not, it's smaller. Why is that, Non?
3
5
SBF
@SBF_FTX
10) Non: because of assholes like you? Idk really, yeah I'm confused why ETH hasn't beaten BTC yet. Maxi: See--the fact that ETH is 20% of BTC _despite_ having more use cases means that it _must_ not be worth much as money, for whatever reason. Non: but what reason?
2
8
SBF
@SBF_FTX
11) Maxi: I don't know, but does it matter why? Maybe it's just because it was first. So it because the dominant accepted crypto-money. And then ETH came along. And, see, if the world decided ETH was money, then it would beat BTC. And that's bad. That would destroy crypto.
1
8
SBF
@SBF_FTX
12) Non: why is better things winning bad? Maxi: _change_ is bad. Because if BTC could lose to ETH, then ETH could lose to newer chains, which could lose to... ...and you see, now the world has accepted that crypto-wealth is fleeting.
2
12
SBF
@SBF_FTX
13) Maxi: Sure you can stack sats, but by next year they'll be the wrong sats. And that means that no sats are ever safe. Crypto is a product of our collective imagination, where we all agree that BTC is money. Once we break that understanding, it doesn't come back.
1
15
SBF
@SBF_FTX
14) Non: so you're saying that it's _evil_ to create more chains? Maxi: no, ETH is great, it's a decentralized global computer! But it's not money. BTC is money. And anyway, we got sidetracked. Even if I'm wrong about _why_, I'm clearly right that BTC is money.
3
7