14) Non: so you're saying that it's _evil_ to create more chains?
Maxi: no, ETH is great, it's a decentralized global computer! But it's not money.
BTC is money.
And anyway, we got sidetracked. Even if I'm wrong about _why_, I'm clearly right that BTC is money.
Conversation
the btc insistence on easy verification on older hardware, refusal to add features that eg 2x utility but add a 1% tail risk, etc are a real difference between btc and eth—btc is actually way better at the adversarial money use case (at the obvious expense of everything else)
2
8
the dialogue in the thread is interesting too, but it kind of presupposes that btc is just an older less full featured version of eth that has adoption for reasons no one really understands—not the case imo
1
4
analogy to an m1 abrams vs a toyota rav4. you can do lots of things in the rav4 quite well—drop the kids off, do some light offroading, go grab some in n out. the only thing the abrams is good for is war, but it's very good at that since it can ignore tradeoffs.
2
1
5
Replying to
sure but in this particular case what are the tradeoffs, other than being older and unmodified?
twitter.com/wheatpond/stat replied below here :)
Quote Tweet
Replying to @wheatpond and @SBF_Alameda
specifically, btc has:
1. higher quality codebase
2. much higher cultural barrier to breaking changes
3. more robust networking layer code tho eth has improved
4. smaller attack surface both at the code & economic level
5. more censorship resistant, due to ease of fullnode

