Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

+++ That way all the AMMs on a pair share liquidity and flow, and customers can just go to the orderbook and not have to think about which to use. Also you can use limit orders *and*, if the orderbook supports margin, so do the AMMs. Plus the AMMs can provide on any curve.

Replying to

and

FWIW that's the ultimate vision for AMMs on Serum -- you can trade directly against them using x*y=k, *or* you can just go to the orderbook and they'll all be providing there too

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

찌 G 跻じ 𝙎𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙖𝙞 of the 𝙃𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙞

Replying to

and

too much big words and thonks tldr is CEXes experience can emulate AMMs liquidity with additional users limit orders?

Quote Tweet

찌 G 跻じ 𝙎𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙖𝙞 of the 𝙃𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙞

@DegenSpartan

Jan 30, 2020

this picture helped me to better visualize what i already know the end game will be aggregators that execute against both DEX orderbooks + liquidity pools to have maximum liquidity CEX models can include that liquidty on top of their off-chain orderbooks same for OTC brokers twitter.com/js_horne/statu…

Show this thread

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

찌 G 跻じ 𝙎𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙖𝙞 of the 𝙃𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙞

Replying to

and

i understood it as the opposite, that the serum AMM is basically the sum of all existing AMMs liquidity profile that anyone in the market can execute against but yeah, the result is a single venue to access all liquidity and leaves the bridging and execution to the backend

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

and

yup CLOB is the aggregating point, not the AMMs directly

Replying to

Is this how it is envisioned? CLOB will be “on chain” and sitting on top of a set of AMMs. User can trade using orderbook for limit orders and can use AMM aggregated feed for market orders.

Replying to

and

or could just send market orders to the orderbook and would still trade against MMs and also AMMs

6:30 AM · Sep 20, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

and yup, all on-chain

Replying to

That is so intricate. So, a single order from user might be filled by MMs and combination of few AMMs. All on chain. As more people provide liquidity to AMM, MMs would have higher competition and spread will be tiny for end user. 👀

Replying to

and

Yup! The beauty of composability :)