Conversation

personally, i think trying to pick out which AMM design will win within the hyper-competitive ethereum space this early in the game is very futile but aggregators will win, especially those that cater to high value transactions where gas fees are negligible to those users
Quote Tweet
The DEX design space is massive. There are many viable strategies for pricing liquidity. The best strategy will depend upon the trading pair, market conditions, trade size, + other factors. A diverse market is a healthy market. A healthy market grows the pie, everyone wins. twitter.com/teo_leibowitz/…
Image
3
87
Replying to
One thing that I think is cool -- you can aggregate all AMMs naively together by having them all achieve their curves by providing in the same orderbook.
3
22
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
so imagine that instead of going directly to an AMM: 1) AMM wants x*y=k; so the AMM places offers out to mimic that curve; same with bids 2) when an offer gets filled, it replaces with a bid, and vice versa 3) to trade on the AMM you just trade on the orderbook
1
12
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
+++ That way all the AMMs on a pair share liquidity and flow, and customers can just go to the orderbook and not have to think about which to use. Also you can use limit orders *and*, if the orderbook supports margin, so do the AMMs. Plus the AMMs can provide on any curve.
2
6
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies