Conversation

personally, i think trying to pick out which AMM design will win within the hyper-competitive ethereum space this early in the game is very futile but aggregators will win, especially those that cater to high value transactions where gas fees are negligible to those users
Quote Tweet
The DEX design space is massive. There are many viable strategies for pricing liquidity. The best strategy will depend upon the trading pair, market conditions, trade size, + other factors. A diverse market is a healthy market. A healthy market grows the pie, everyone wins. twitter.com/teo_leibowitz/…
Image
3
87
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
so imagine that instead of going directly to an AMM: 1) AMM wants x*y=k; so the AMM places offers out to mimic that curve; same with bids 2) when an offer gets filled, it replaces with a bid, and vice versa 3) to trade on the AMM you just trade on the orderbook
1
12
Show replies
Heya Sam - we believe we're close here:
Quote Tweet
Announcing creamY, a Capital Efficient, Dynamic AMM. creamY allows: - Dynamic pool updates - Yielding, stable versions of assets - Consolidated Liquidity to avoid fragmented pools - Single-Sided Liquidity medium.com/cream-finance/
Show this thread
2
20
oooo thought about building it on Serum? We have fully customizable pools coming out this week, would be perfect for it; also composable with on-chain orderbooks. And, you know, fast and cheap and stuff :)
2
17
Show replies