Conversation

Replying to
13) making a lot of assumptions there -- just sort of multiplying estimated average fees by adjusted volume; is relativley good if *make sure to add up spot + derivatives!* also I think the gecko undercounts some spot volume, e.g. huobi, by a bit
1
20
14) sure, alright. so huobi is big, and then... it depends on what metrics you use, really. FWIW liquidity is probably roughly: huobi/ftx uni/coinbase/sushi not really sure how to think about tether here
2
19
16) volume is something like: huobi: 5b ftx: 1b uni/coinbase: 500m sushi: 100m tether: 50m (creation/redemption; trading way higher)
2
28
17) anyway guys there are some rankings. also fwiw in case anyone's interested: Coinbase: no public valuation/token, last $10b??? ftt: 350 circ, 1b full ht: 1b circ, 2.5b full sushi: 150 circ, ~350 (?) full tether: no public valuation/fee token uni: 350 circ, 5.5b full
9
36
18) and remember some are newer than others! uni is old but its prominence is newer, and fees are forthcoming. sushi is really new but also in some ways very old :P tether is old, coinbase is old, huobi is old ftx is relatively new
2
23
19) anyway none of this was investment advice. but yeah a lot of people seem to be posting stuff on twitter that doesn't exactly line up with the numbers.
3
33
20) TL;DR: userbase, volume, revenue, and liquidity all give somewhat different rankings of platforms also we all forgot about huobi but it's still big
4
43
21) also note I didn't list here because tbh its revenue model is complicated and I'm not thinking about it clearly enough to know what to think of it. I'll try to get around to that.
5
46
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more