Conversation

SBF

@SBF_FTX

1) Man this $SAFE thing seems like such a a messy situation. I don't have any context on in really, but it seems like:

8:55 AM · Sep 16, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

2) a) looks like neither really understood IL that well. b) informal contracts are super powerful and get shit done, but also really messy and have big downside if there isn't enough trust and history c) Balancer pools can be confusing to add initial liquidity to

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Sep 16, 2020

3) d) a ton of moralizing around things like 'selling' vs 'dumping' to try to claim the high ground e) it's unclear what it means to 'run' a DeFi protocol if the team doesn't own any f) don't cofound something with people you don't already trust!

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Sep 16, 2020

4) probably there's also a lot of important missing context, idk The two sides so far: twitter.com/chefinsurance/ twitter.com/AzeemFi/status

This Tweet is unavailable.

SBF

@SBF_FTX

Sep 16, 2020

5) honestly it just feels weird to write a tweet thread with only 4 tweets

Replying to

and

Too short, sir. I need more

Replying to

and

4000$ to 300$ lolol, that got farmed & dumped hard & not even named after a food!

Replying to

alright at least I got a typo into the first tweet, good enough, I'll take it

Replying to

and

give me a thread like Hemingway's novels

Replying to

and

GIF

read image description

ALT

Replying to

and

seems like one person made a lot of assumptions, while the other just dropped evidence. imo if you read through the chats it's nothing too dramatic really. it's unfortunate - it's an unnecessary mess that could have been resolved privately.