1/8 This excessive fees incident seems to be very much related to the #SushiSwap incident; its transfer of control between and and the "Sushi buyback"
(h/t )
Conversation
Quote Tweet
I have returned all the $14M worth of ETH back to the treasury. And I will let the community decide how much I deserve as the original creator of SushiSwap. In any currency (ETH/SUSHI/etc). With any lockup schedule you wish.
etherscan.io/tx/0xa5179a870
Show this thread
1
3/8 The address is a "MultiSig wallet" contract that is solely controlled by 0xd57581d9e42e9032e6f60422fa619b4a4574ba79 as the address of was removed from wallet etherscan.io/tx/0xe4fcf8aa9
1
4/8 0xd57581d9e42e9032e6f60422fa619b4a4574ba79 is the address of
1
5/8 and today this 's address paid $185K to expedite a Tx that moves all these funds out from the "MultiSig" contract controlled by address to address itself
1
7/8 from address money went to 0x9f9643c8b413b32c3a1270068487f341e5be8bfd and from there to the
1
8/8 According to this money transfer is related to the Sushi buyback. But what is the reason for the excessive fees?
Quote Tweet
The SUSHI buyback has finished!
etherscan.io/address/0xD575
Show this thread
1
1
Replying to
dude get your shit together.
1) you're ignoring the massive SUSHI transfer into the wallet
2) you're ignoring the tx that was pending for a long time before that
3) we paid those fees out of pocket
4) yeah we overpaid, shit happens :P
1
I believe the thread was respectful and informative and just asking about the fees.
I don't know why you choose to respond in such manner.
I hope you will be able to get your SUSHIT 🍣💩 together in the future
1
1
Replying to
alright imma be honest, I misread your first tweet and thought it was claiming that this was similar to the nomi incident.
Sorry about that!
Any interesting details about that fees mistake? Or just a simple human mistake ?
1
1
Show replies