If there was a solid team of 4-5 I’d say 1% since 99% of the work was forked.
Vested over 5 years.
I don’t view these people as founders or builders. They are migration and duplication engineers.
If they invent something new and innovative, that’s different.
Conversation
So you still haven't said a %.
What % would you say? Because this was still waaay less than 1%.
1
2
Sure, so if you actually think 0.10% is the right number, then that's cool.
I think it's hilariously low and you'll basically never find another project or company with a number that low (except for ones that decide it should be 0, which is a choice you could make!)
1
1
This is not a project. It’s a 3 week fork. In a few years it might actually be something.
1
2
If you think it has no value then you shouldn't worry about 1% of the value being granted.
2
3
Sam, come on. I offered up my office and any capital I could spare to help Uniswap get off the ground.
Please don’t get on the high horse here.
I have found this entire episode incredibly distasteful and was trying to engage in a fair discussion about vesting.
2
8
well I definitely disagree with your definition of fair! Or at least of reasonable.
But looks like we're just not going to see eye to eye on this.
You seem like you hate sushiswap anyway and have no interest in it doing well so no point in continuing this conversation.
2
4
No. I hate any project having absolutely no vesting.
Ethereum included.
I also dislike the tone the entire community took towards the people who actually built the original.
Cloners are not founders.
They are hired guns that should be treated as such.
3
7
The tone was terrible I agree, lead in part to the person who made it. Maki was not an engineer and was doing actual work. If sushi is worth something in 1-2 years it will have been a lot more than a fork. A basic fork probably won't last long. So from that pov vesting works
2
4
yeah TBH putting vesting in it would help a lot
It would pretty much resolve the entire topic at hand.
No vesting = no *real* reason to commit to the longterm success of the project.
No reason to commit = what even is your goal?
1
5
Can someone screengrab the responses for me here?
Is he conceding that vesting would be useful?
Does he feel that paying $1.3m for a month’s work is a bad idea?
It seems like the tide is turning in the “community”.
1
1
Show replies