all of it
Conversation
I am curious: do you think that payout is reasonable?
No employee of any company gets a deal like that.
1
1
I wasn't commenting on the payout, I was commenting on the fact that Scott had just unambiguously lied and that's not ok.
2
4
Yep. I’m not here to comment on that.
As a separate point. I’m curious if you think this is a reasonable proposal?
1
3
In general what % of a project do you think is reasonable to go to founders?
I mean if your answer is '0%, founders shouldn't get rewarded', that's fine, but wanted to check if that's true, or otherwise what % you'd say.
3
2
I think if founders end up with 20% of a public company that’s great.
For protocols it feels like sub 10% is more optimal.
For 2 weeks work that largely involved forking others’ work, it feels like a lot less.
What if it was 100k sushi vesting over 5 years with a 1 year cliff?
3
4
If there was a solid team of 4-5 I’d say 1% since 99% of the work was forked.
Vested over 5 years.
I don’t view these people as founders or builders. They are migration and duplication engineers.
If they invent something new and innovative, that’s different.
2
6
So you still haven't said a %.
What % would you say? Because this was still waaay less than 1%.
1
2
Sure, so if you actually think 0.10% is the right number, then that's cool.
I think it's hilariously low and you'll basically never find another project or company with a number that low (except for ones that decide it should be 0, which is a choice you could make!)
This is not a project. It’s a 3 week fork. In a few years it might actually be something.
1
2
If you think it has no value then you shouldn't worry about 1% of the value being granted.
2
3
Show replies