Conversation
I am curious: do you think that payout is reasonable?
No employee of any company gets a deal like that.
1
1
I wasn't commenting on the payout, I was commenting on the fact that Scott had just unambiguously lied and that's not ok.
2
4
Yep. I’m not here to comment on that.
As a separate point. I’m curious if you think this is a reasonable proposal?
1
3
In general what % of a project do you think is reasonable to go to founders?
I mean if your answer is '0%, founders shouldn't get rewarded', that's fine, but wanted to check if that's true, or otherwise what % you'd say.
3
2
I think if founders end up with 20% of a public company that’s great.
For protocols it feels like sub 10% is more optimal.
For 2 weeks work that largely involved forking others’ work, it feels like a lot less.
What if it was 100k sushi vesting over 5 years with a 1 year cliff?
3
4
Honestly I think I'd like you to first propose what % you think is correct in this case. "A lot less than 10%" -- what % does that mean?
To be clear you just proposed about 0.05%, which I would say is probably not what you meant by "a lot less".
3
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Yeah so in this case Maki is both a founder and a builder, so this is sort of a joint grant for both
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Isnt a founder and a builder as well? Why are we not voting for him to recieve his cut as well. He gave everything back and its not even an option to give back to our true founder?