Conversation

Replying to
Unsurprisingly, the saga continues: A contributor, , is looking to claim a “founder grant” of ~$1.34m in the first 12 months. It looks like it’s going to be approved by the current voters. People need to dive into how vesting schedules work.
Image
Image
Quote Tweet
I'd like to signal my intend of going fulltime with @SushiSwap if this proposal is accepted by the community, your support would be appreciated and if it doesn't pass I will still be helping while sleep-deprivated : snapshot.page/#/sushi/propos
4
11
I mean I guess I would have said that a few % for founding + a few % for continued work on Sushi going forward would be reasonable, mostly locked up long-term. You can do the math about where that gets you, but it's a lot higher than this.
2
1
Show replies
I think if founders end up with 20% of a public company that’s great. For protocols it feels like sub 10% is more optimal. For 2 weeks work that largely involved forking others’ work, it feels like a lot less. What if it was 100k sushi vesting over 5 years with a 1 year cliff?
3
4
Honestly I think I'd like you to first propose what % you think is correct in this case. "A lot less than 10%" -- what % does that mean? To be clear you just proposed about 0.05%, which I would say is probably not what you meant by "a lot less".
3
Sushi has shown the best and worst of crypto and I think Sam / Alameda absolutely saved a project that is net positive to the ecosystem (5 BPS share to dex token holders is appropriate) the grants to Maki are insane. Maybe 10-15k sushi today (3 weeks of work) + 300k 24-36 mo vest
1
Show replies