1) My thoughts on direction for Sushi
Conversation
6) Also, I'd reduce taker fees from 30bps to 20bps, maker rebate of 15bps, and 5bps --> SUSHI holders. This lines up more with prevailing rates in the industry.
Replying to
7) Next, I'd compose with and to create seemless margin trading on Sushiswap.
3
16
144
8) Finally--yes I'm biased!--I'd build out a branch on Serum.
If you haven't tried it yet, you should: serum-academy.com/en/dex-list/
That's 1 second orders, $0.00002 gas, 100% on-chain orderbook/matching engine. Imagine if Sushiswap was that fast and cheap and powerful. Aim big!
11
26
174
So LPs go from taking a 1/6 paycut versus uniswap to taking a 1/2 paycut versus uniswap. I'm not exactly sure they'll be lining up to switch to this
1
Traders would if they pay lower fees; LPs need volumes for the profitability triangle to push upwards. If the plaform has high fees, traders won't use it. Whereas for LPs there can be other incentives other than fees (e.g. EcoSerum..).
CFMM seems to have a worse equilibrium for makers than CLOB MM. To counteract that, shouldnโt the fees be more favorable toward them, to create a buffer against arbitrage?
2
6
2




