Really interesting dynamic here with going full degen yield farming. Just eyeballing the account it seems like at one point between 20-30% of the entire AUM of Sushi was coming from an account associated with . Which kind of begs the question…
Conversation
Where does this risk ultimately sit on this trade? Several people in the community have reviewed the code but we didn’t audit it and the complexity of the contracts was such that we felt there was reasonable SC risk here.
1
1
47
Replying to
What % of your $ is in SNX?
What are the odds SNX goes down at least enough so you lose 1% of your $? (Hint it's like 40% or something in the next day, crypto volatile yo.)
I claim you're being inconsistent here.
1
9
I’m not sure that this analogy holds since I’m both escrowed as a core contributor and escrowed via staking rewards for at least another year. So even if I wanted to diversify to a “reasonable” level I couldn’t. Plus I’m also realistically liquidity trapped.
2
5
Replying to
Oh yeah totes agree, you don't have a choice there.
But when you wake up each day, how bad does it feel that you are forced to have that position? (Or does it even feel bad? Maybe it feels like you trust your instincts?)
vs how you'd feel if you had 1/4 as much in sushi
1
5
Basically my point is: I think in addition to one being a choice and the other forced, you _also_ feel like one is more "bad" than the other, even if they're comparable risks.
I'd guess you fucking believe in SNX so it doesn't feel like a "gamble" it feels like a strategic play
3
3
I mean I don’t think either of them are bad, I’m in the Sushi trade as well and I’m doing a farm and hold strategy, it’s a good trade imo. But I wouldn’t put 10% of my aum into it, I mean maybe in a few days it gets better but first mover yield farming induces massive tail risk.
1
8
Haha like 50% or something. Based, Yam, that scam from yesterday with the faked approval.
2
5
Go under is not accurate have a contract issue would be more accurate. But it’s a matter of time before there is a catastrophic loss imo.
1
7
Show replies

