Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
Orthogonal to the circular notion that the price of SNX will be whatever is required for the system not to become undercollateralized. Otherwise we would just collateralize DAI with MKR. Fwiw I am fairly sure that agrees with this point and has said as much many times.
1
11
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Wait, isn’t the implied negative interest rate indicative of the fact that Maker doesn’t / can’t actually follow market rates, but instead is subject to wonky human governance? Also, dominance of perps suggests they are the best way to get leverage
1
7
Replying to and
No, it doesn’t. It implies that they prefer not breaking the peg and taking on that excess purchasing power volatility to implementing true negative interest rates. See:
Quote Tweet
Replying to @PhABCD @hasufl and 4 others
Not actually targeting the Market Price to the Target Price is equivalent to running a system deficit; not opining on that path but Lev explains why well here: forum.makerdao.com/t/mip20-target
2
3
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
3) if the collateral can blow out that's scary; it threatens the safety of the assets. SNX collateral is terrifying compared to ETH collateral. 4) Perps are super liquid b/c they "expire" in ~1 day, so you don't have to worry about premiums persisting--funding makes you whole.
1