6) Anyone who's used existing protocols has felt this: the frustration of waiting 5 minutes for a transaction before learning it failed because of something that happened after you sent it; seeing a estimated gas cost of $100 during peak times. It's really holding back the space.
Conversation
9) And after drafts and experiments and revisions and feedback and iteration, we're excited to tell you about what we've been working on.
This is Project Serum.
projectserum.com
2
6
59
16) Finally, there's SRM: the Serum token, a SPL (Solana based) token that powers Serum.
100% of net fees go to a burn of SRM, holders get discounts on fees, and SRM can be staked on nodes to help optimize the network's performance.
19) Join us on Telegram (web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@Projec), twitter (twitter.com/ProjectSerum), and online (projectserum.com).
Or see us soon, on a blockchain near you. (And maybe an exchange.)
2
23
20) (also the website just went live, so it could take 20m or so for the DNS records to propogate. Sorry about that!)
Meanwhile you can play a fun game on Solana:
break.solana.com/setup?cluster=
4
2
37
Why did the team choose to burn instead of handing fees over to holders/stakers? Securities issue?
1
Doesn't burning fees... decreased supply, which increases price, which helps holders/stakers. I see the result, just a different way and a better way. BNB burns their tokens as well.
1
1
Show replies


