Conversation

SBF
@SBF_FTX
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
7) This is a terrible solution but it does represent a real problem: if your market last traded 5 hours ago and prices have changed since then, 'last' will be out of date. And if you're graphing last price, your graph will not display a reasonable current price.
2
10
SBF
@SBF_FTX
9) You can see why some shady exchanges could use this to justify faking volume. "We just wanted our graphs to be informative!", they say. "We're looking out for our customers!"
1
11
SBF
@SBF_FTX
10) To be clear, I do _not_ endorse faking volume to make graphs look pretty--it's vital for the space that we present real accurate data. That's, like, the whole point of blockchains! But this does present a real headache for many exchanges. Using our mark price fixes this.
1
14
SBF
@SBF_FTX
11) So, ok, last isn't great. But why not mid? Well, say that some exchange's market is $10 @ $9500. "Mid" is $4755, but that's probably not what the coin is worth. It could be worth $9400! The problem is that if markets are too wide, mid might be crazy.
1
5
SBF
@SBF_FTX
12) So in that case, you need something better than mid--you need to narrow it down within the spread. And the last traded price is a pretty reasonable way to do it.
1
7
SBF
@SBF_FTX
12) Sure, your pricing might not be quite right--it could be worth $9300 now instead of $9400--but when a market is $10 @ $9500 your goal isn't "show the exact fair value". Your goal is "show something that's not totally insane". So once again our mark price is reasonable.
1
6
SBF
@SBF_FTX
13) Now I don't want to claim that median(bid,ask,last) is the _perfect_ system. There are lots of others! Should you incorporate bid size? How about time since trade? Maybe!
1
7
SBF
@SBF_FTX
14) But it shouldn't be an exchange's goal to do really complicated calculations to estimate fair values for customers--that's their job. The goal is to report accurate, timely, reasonable data that's easy to parse. Mark price is simple to understand and it's reasonable.
2
19
Bitbit
@bitbitcrypto
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
and
@SBF_Alameda
Didn’t know running an exchange is such a headache. That’s why I guess paying maker orders make more sense, you get the liquidity takers need and mark calculations becomes less of an issue
1
3
Bitbit
@bitbitcrypto
Replying to
@SBF_FTX
and
@SBF_Alameda
Lower the minimum size like binance do, should fix the ugly graphs issue. You’re an exchange, your clients are traders, traders are not customers, they don’t know what they need listed, you should know better. but I tell you what traders hate, they hate limits and restrictions.
5