its a typo.
Just crosscheck with the previous image and u are gonna notice that all other allocations are still the same.
Meaning if it's not a typo index cant be 100%
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
yes, so should their assets in the index.
it's a tricky problem. but the numbers you see are the allocation per coin proportional to the %. If you reduce weight in one of them you actually gotta increase collateral of other assets to maintain 100%.
Let's wait,Sam'll answer soon
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Its a 2way problem cause although true
If they cash out the tokens based on ur index u are gonna end up negative since you are gonna have to pay more tokens than u allocate in ur index.
tokens still worth 0.1x 10=100$ ==1 index token
but when i cashout i get 95$ worth of tokens
1
0.1 x 10 (10$ value/coin) 100$ = 1 index token(100$)/ 10%/coin
now 0.1 x 9 + 0.05 x 1 95$ (=) 1 index token(95$) /10.5%/coin
but index still worth 100$ so are the tokens, in order to actually worth 1 index token(100$) u gotta buy 0.005 tokens x 9 otherwise u have lost the peg
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Hey guys--sorry, there was a typo in the _original_ tentative list. COMP had a 20% weight in DeFi, which was worth ~$1k when it listed; so it should have a value of about $200/contract.