Conversation

This is a pretty weird list! a) some of the exchanges here are ~99% fake b) pretty sure basically every exchange grew a lot in march; where are e.g. Binance/Huobi/OKEx? c) FTX should def be there, ftx.com/ftt shows burns from fees

Quote Tweet

CryptoDiffer - StandWithUkraine

@CryptoDiffer

Apr 19, 2020

TOP 15 EXCHANGES BY ESTIMATED TRADING FEES REVENUES GROWTH IN MARCH The best performers are @MXC_exchange (+114.9%), @BitforexCom (+59.9%), @BitStamp (+48.6%), @BitMax_Official (+47.8%) and @CoinBasePro (+39.6%).

4:38 PM · Apr 19, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

SOME are fake? ok...

Replying to

and

What if it’s actually talked about “growth rate” of trading fees? So top 3 exchanges aren’t listed, but FTX isn’t there is really fake.

Replying to

FTX's fees grew by both larger % and larger $ than e.g. coinone's did

Show replies

Replying to

and

Technically speaking, a $100 revenue to $241.90 is a 114.9% jump :p

Maks ZBS/CryptoDiffer

Replying to

and

Exactly the case for small exchanges Smaller exchanges have a room for growth, but fake volume is the issue. Industry def needs a resource that can determine the real volume of exchanges. If anyone knows a solution please let us know, will make our life easier

Show replies

Replying to

and

Well u have bitmax 5/5 stars on volume monitor but I see them faking volume every day!

Replying to

If you have evidence of this send it over--they def had e.g. transmining in the past but last time we looked at it the volume looked real

Show replies

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Maks ZBS/CryptoDiffer

Replying to

and

The problem of this exact post is that we can work only with reported data. I tried to explain this above, if you know any source that can give us the real volumes, please let me know. Moreover even the reported volume for 30days is very hard to get, we got data from CryptoRank