Conversation

2) They claim 11b of "Total Volume", but their graph only has $500m of lifetime value. Where's the other 95%?

3) I gotta say, DueDEX has balls for putting "DEX" in the name of a centralized exchange. I mean, it's scummy, but definitely ballsy.

4) @DueDEX_Official's posts got about 1 like each, until August 4th (twitter.com/DueDEX_Officia), which got 3.6k likes and an astounding 3.1k retweets and 1.5k comments. What are those comments?

This Tweet is unavailable.

5) Two *very* enterprising bots seem to have liked many of the other bots' comments, including their own:

6) DuoDEX's CEO retweeted this particular bot-infested post:

1:55 AM · Nov 10, 2019Twitter Web App

7) DuoDEX has started making a big deal out of "No internal trading desk". Their orderbook, however, is extremely consistent: ~$150k on two levels each for the bid and offer, and tiny size behind that. Who do you think that is?

Replying to

8) On the bright side, they seem to have figured out time travel!

9) DueDEX really doesn't seem to like using the 'space' key on their keyboard:

10) Somone put a lot of work into faking volume there! The orderbook will be 8782.5 @ 8785; they'll momentarily place a bid at 8783; hit that bid; and cancel the remainder. If I manually bid 8782.5, they'll start faking the volume at 8783 instead.

11) As already reported, they went strait to the source for their help docs: twitter.com/cachiestboi/st

This Tweet is unavailable.