Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
RyanMaue's profile
Ryan Maue
Ryan Maue
Ryan Maue
Verified account
@RyanMaue

Tweets

Ryan MaueVerified account

@RyanMaue

Meteorologist (PhD)🌡Forecasting 🌎 Weather & Climate | Follow The Science™ | @WhiteHouse45 Hurricanes | Maps @weathermodels_ | Weather Enterprise

Atlanta, GA
weather.substack.com
Joined September 2008

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      🧵 Happy Monday I'm going to let you in on a secret It is out in the open but I doubt you've heard about it Th most recent CMIP6 modeling studies of tropical cyclones/hurricanes project no detectable changes in storm metrics most associated with damage ... under RCP8.5 ... 1/n

      3 replies 23 retweets 54 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Kreusseler et al GRL look at "integrated kinetic energy" (IKE) as a metric of potential damage and in model projections find "no significant changes in lifetime maximum IKE between present climate conditions and a projected climate scenario" https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GL090963 …pic.twitter.com/TwhITQ0AEK

      1 reply 11 retweets 16 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Very important Kreussler et al support Klotzbach et al 2020: "minimum in MSLP seems to be a better predictor of IKE in HR than the max wind speed, which tends to support the use of central pressure deficit as a better proxy than max surface winds to estimate TC damage"pic.twitter.com/N05ErAVBgt

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Kreussler et al provides additional confirmatory evidence of the robustness of the normalization methods most recently applied in Weinkle et al 2018 for hurricane damage 1900-2017 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0165-2 … This a welcome confirmation of our workpic.twitter.com/7UQHh6OslH

      1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Roberts et al 2020 GRL arrive at consistent results, also using RCP*.5 forcing (interestingly and appropriately) to "enhance the signal" https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GL088662 …pic.twitter.com/dHu3J8IKMU

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Even under "enhanced signal" of RCP8.5 Roberts et al are unable to detect in projections meaningful changes to TC behavior (only a few hints of small changes)pic.twitter.com/2AeGY38hqL

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      This passive voice construction made me laugh out loud: "the relatively short reliable historical record may also be conflating multidecadal variability and climate change signals" I can say authoritatively that it is not the historical record doing any conflating 😎

      2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      Bottom line On hurricanes . . . The long-term historical record doesn't support claims of detection of a climate change signal Most recent, state-of-the art models don't support claims we should now or soon be seeing such signals Feel free to accept or deny the evidence /END

      1 reply 7 retweets 30 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      PS. None of this argues against any climate policies I support net-zero by 2050 But what it does mean is that if you are using hurricanes to try to sell climate policies (looking at you @ClimateEnvoy) then you are risking your claim to be well-grounded in evidence and science

      4 replies 4 retweets 19 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Roger Pielke Jr.‏Verified account @RogerPielkeJr Apr 26

      PPS Despite evidence & research the weight of conventional wisdom is heavy Compare this group of NOAA GFDL authors who say at one place that climate change "probably" increasing intensity (L) & elsewhere it is "premature to conclude with high confidence" (R) Confusing? Yeah🤷‍♂️pic.twitter.com/9rU9V6P4Jv

      1 reply 5 retweets 8 likes
      Show this thread
      Ryan Maue‏Verified account @RyanMaue Apr 26
      Replying to @RogerPielkeJr

      The observational record is pretty clear -- there has been NO recent increase in number of global major hurricanes. 🌀 How do we know this? A simple counting exercise: Last 18-years (2003-2021): 442 MH Previous 18-years (1985-2003): 438 MH I'll go with "premature" (R)pic.twitter.com/OKwDPnCkj7

      7:05 AM - 26 Apr 2021
      • 73 Retweets
      • 152 Likes
      • James Leeson mojowjowjow BlahBlahBlah note bot jim Frieda’s Mom Bent Preben Nielsen Frederic Kevin Williams
      climatlas
      6 replies 73 retweets 152 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Timlagor‏ @Timlagor Apr 26
          Replying to @RyanMaue @curryja and

          18 years as the cutoff isn't *at all* suspicious

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Hugh‏ @Hughristics Apr 27
          Replying to @Timlagor @RyanMaue and

          Do you see an obvious pattern, then? I don't think you can look at this and really conclude anything.pic.twitter.com/KTAVKet6kX

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Hawthorne Hay‏ @HayHawthorne Apr 26
          Replying to @RyanMaue @RogerPielkeJr @climatlas

          I’d be interesting to compare these numbers to what they would be in the different basins, to see if there is a change in the number of hurricanes in different locations.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Mookie Tobin‏ @MookieTobin Apr 26
          Replying to @RyanMaue @RogerPielkeJr @climatlas

          Last years hurricane season, which is touted as a cause of "climate change", had an ACE of 178.8 is nowhere near a record year.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Justin Harris‏ @JustinH43489902 Apr 26
          Replying to @MookieTobin @RyanMaue and

          It was actually 181 ace, so you’re quite wrong there. And ace is really only good for measuring longevity of tc, so it’s not a good way of determining tc frequency. But that’s besides the point.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
      1. Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info